h4831sc Fundamentals Explained

What is Anyone having excellent accuracy with for 180gr tablets and 4831? Just looking for a place to begin so I do not squander a bunch of factors. Many thanks for the help!

I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was producing a lot more pressure and was slower compared to the old things. I don't bear in mind if I even attempted typical h4831 or not; I am thinking not. Click to expand...

That you are correct These are the same the SC is short Slash so it meters greater, I do not Imagine you can find just typical 4831 anymore

Operate your load up with the particular powder (sc or frequent) and whole lot you're working with however. Identical burn rate does not imply it is going to behave "specifically" the identical. I've seen about one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

My knowledge is that the SC and SSC loaded to the same pounds as being the extensive Slash displays a lowered velocity.

I realize, rough periods. H4831SC will definitely get the job done, I just didn't like the situation density when loaded extended. I do not don't forget powder demand off the top of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps that is wherever I generally intention to become. In your situation using what you have got (and what I ought to have performed) I would begin with the end from the bearing floor of the bullet appropriate in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you finally look for a velocity node.

I don't love to operate up a load using one lot of powder and then have to work up once more since I run out and possess to get started on employing a new ton variety.

excaliber claimed: I have uncovered the precise reverse being legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly exact powder in my three hundred Earn h4831sc load data Mag.

The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to benefit from the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon extreme powder.

You may have to generate a number of additional posts to receive cleared to try and do PM's. As soon as you get to that standing I might put up from the labeled reloading segment to see if any one is near you for just a trade. Click on to develop...

I have experienced identical experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not likely shoot properly with just about anything other than h4831 vs h4831sc Fed215's. Some parts just Will not Participate in very well with other. Seems like you have picked out 3 superior powders, I'd count on at the least one of these to shoot.

This is often an extreme extruded propellant and provides heightened insensitivity to hot and cold temperatures.

I frequently constantly receive the sc Edition. Using a powder evaluate it hangs up a lot less on account of shorter kernels and I feel enables more reliable metering so considerably less time you take trickling in the last bit of demand to produce weight. So generally the SC will save you instances

I sawed 1 in fifty percent to discover how thick the jackets were being, and they were very easily two times as thick being a fifty-grain hollow place was. Ditto with the sixty four-grain Power Point, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know almost everything I find out about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I don't know everything in any way with regards to the 223. I question that you are going to h4831 vs h4831sc get any where with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know the way it goes.